Daily Archives: June 2, 2012

Anthony Gregory on the Safety of Pot

On Thursday Anthony Gregory published a brilliant article at The Huffington Post on decriminalizing marijuana. I have virtually nothing to add to his piece, but wanted to share his insight on the matter. Of particular importance are his points about the relative safety of pot compared with other drugs (it’s not only considered safer than alcohol and tobacco, but caffeine as well).

This is not to suggest that safety should be the main thrust of pro-decriminalization arguments. If we indeed own our bodies then safety is both a subjective term and a personal matter. Safety issues are important because it helps to correct long-standing myths about the drug, which are used by drug warriors to scare the public into supporting their inhumane program. It’s a lot easier to convince people that prison rape is an acceptable treatment for drug addiction if there is fear of what the alternative might be.

Here is one passage of Gregory’s piece that I found important:

The entire drug war is a monstrosity, a crime against the Bill of Rights, the greatest contributor to gang violence, a wholesale attack on our civil liberties and the right of individuals to control their own bodies. Characterizing drug problems as a criminal justice issue has been an unmitigated failure, except for serving law-enforcement special interests, growing the bureaucracy, and deepening the pockets of drug kingpins who profit off this madness.

Marijuana criminalization always rested on the flimsiest of grounds. Fear of blacks and Hispanics fueled the hysteria. So did conflicting propaganda about how marijuana would make American youth violent, yet also make them docile and unable to serve in the Armed Forces.

If marijuana is not the most benign recreational drug known to humanity, it is near the top. Alcohol kills tens of thousands of Americans a year. Tobacco kills hundreds of thousands. Pot directly kills zero.

Scientists measure the lethality of a drug by its therapeutic index. The TI gauges how many effective doses of a drug it takes to kill the median user. Alcohol’s TI is somewhere around ten. Caffeine’s is approximately one hundred. Marijuana’s is a matter of conjecture, since it’s been extrapolated from studies with lab rats and other such methods. But scientists estimate its TI somewhere between 1,000 and 40,000. In other words, marijuana is somewhere between a hundred and four thousand times less lethal than alcohol.

Read the full article here.


Why Paul is Wrong on Pakistani Aid

Senator Rand Paul will introduce legislation next week to suspend aid to Pakistan until the government frees Dr. Shakil Afridi, an informant working for the CIA, who helped with the raid on Osama Bin Laden’s house. Though Paul was critical of aid in general, saying “Foreign aid has been an abysmal failure,” such efforts are really only half measures if the goal is to end aid. In fact, withholding aid in this way and promising to reinstate it afterwards only reinforces its legitimacy as foreign policy bribe money.

Aid to Pakistan shouldn’t be cut because their government has prosecuted an informant. Aid to Pakistan (and all other nations, for that matter) should be eliminated because it’s immoral. In the words of Ron Paul, “Foreign aid is taking money from poor people in rich countries and giving it to rich people in poor countries.”

This is another reason (on a growing list) of why Rand Paul’s philosophy is to Ron Paul’s philosophy, what CATO/Reason is to LewRockwell.com/The Mises Institute. That is to say, it’s an intellectual and ideological lightweight in the libertarian school of thought. It’s libertarianism that is grounded on a pragmatic or utilitarian foundation, as opposed to one that rests on morality and a consistent application of the non-aggression principle.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 94 other followers

%d bloggers like this: