Every once in a while the politically well-connected lawyers on the Supreme Court issue an opinion that is narrowly consistent with personal liberty. Today they did that, denying police employees the legal authority to forcibly extract blood samples from drivers suspected of driving under the influence. Instead, one set of government employees will have to get the approval of another set of government employees in the form of a warrant.
Kansas City radio hosts Scott Parks and Dana Wright discussed the issue, and a caller mentioned that in Missouri (the state the case originated from) littering is a Class A misdemeanor, while DUI is only a Class B. Of course this didn’t sit well with them; they thought it should be the other way around.
It shouldn’t bother them, or anyone. Driving drunk isn’t really a crime, in so far as there is no victim. Littering on the other hand does have a victim, in that it may represent a trespass against someone’s property. (Walter Block’s argument notwithstanding, since his example refers to a voluntary transaction.)


